Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Concern and disturbance...
It started out apparently innocent enough. One of our regular contributors made some comments after the morning news was posted late last week. However, over the long weekend, these comments were analyzed more intensely by our cultural writer and resident MD. It has now been brought to the attention of the administration that contributor "Donny" may very well have been saying that if he had an identical twin brother, that it would not be wrong to perform fellatio on him. Donny then asked for thoughts on this issue. One of our authors recommended testing first. which also brings to light some questions regarding his willingness to engage in sexual acts with an std free duplicate of himself. Thus I post this as today's main morning topic. Its been a long weekend and we all need some light discussion to engage in to get us back on track for the short work week ahead. Good luck and God speed in the exploration of this and whatever other issues arise. Keep it good.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Well, if he was willing to fellate himself, a male, then the next logical conclusion is that he would be willing to fellate another man. It may start innocently enough (first, a carbon copy, next a "similar" looking dude, and digress further from there).
That said, we are all dumber for reading and analyzing this.
Let this be clear: my comment was made with this poor sap's best interests in mind and was not meant as an endorsement of his derelict lifestyle choices.
He may suffer from Narcissism, in which case, I know someone he would do well to consult.
It appears as though poster "Donny" posed the question as to whether the bloggers and readership on this website would give a clone of themselves a blowjob.
As a medical professional and the cultural editor of this blog, I am uniquely qualified to analyze the situation.
The term "identical twins" is not a misnomer. They are the product of the splitting of a single egg, and are for all intents and purposes -- IDENTICAL.
Therefore, to a substantial degree of medical certainty, there is simply no discernible difference, whatsoever, between giving your clone a blowjob and giving your identical twin a blowjob. For these reasons, I hereby declare this a gay question.
Now, as cultural editor, it is important to note that there is nothing wrong with it being a gay question. That is part of our culture. Which is why I feel uniquely qualifed -- as cultural editor -- to analyze the statement.
Dr. Lenny - are you also uniquely qualified because you have been in the situation where you have given your clone or identical twin (or, assuming there are neither, your brother or father perhaps) blow jobs?
If a clone blows in the woods, does it make a sound?
No, but I'm sure the clone will tattle.
Post a Comment